Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Funny, Dan, in the thread I gave the links to you didn't come right out and use the word, heretic, but the meaning was there which in my opinion is the same thing. Now you have become much bolder and are calling the three-stepper doctrine heretical. Interesting.
I provided other links above which prove this so-called "new fangled, heretical doctrine" has been around for almost 2000 years! Now who's trying to rewrite/revise history, Dan?  |
Good point. I also had noticed myself Dan's anti-3stepper rhetoric has gone to another level. Now we're "heretics", I see.
Well, they called Jesus worse names than that, so I guess being called a heretic is relatively trivial.
But I'm reminded of Pauls words in
Acts 24:14:
" ... after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers"
Nevertheless...that kind of rhetoric is EXACTLY WHY the NoMoreWalls group is right to keep out 1-steppers such as Dan. Certain of these people say they want a seat at the table... but why would they want to have a seat at the table
with people they consider heretics?
Furthermore, the goal of the militant 1-steppers is not merely to have
fellowship with those who advocate 3-stepper doctrine, but to work toward
eradicating 3-stepper doctrine. Their idea of "Apostolic unity" is an environment in which we'd have the eventual elimination of 3-step doctrine.
Not. going. to happen.
Threaded Mode
