You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Bro. Epley, what did I say about it? That is what you are arguing. Please, tell the truth.

Maybe THESE will help?

"I understand your reluctance to discuss Daniel 9:24. If those points are fulfilled, “the gap” is nullified. If Jesus didn’t complete them, He "failed” His task. Anti-missionary Rabbis’ claim this last point to "unconvert" Christians. Jews for Judaism1 (JFJ) asks: "How can we be sure that Jesus' promises to return are false prophecy?" The writer responds: "Jesus, it is claimed, prophesied that certain unspecified individuals would not die until they would see either 'the Son of Man coming in his kingdom' (Mat 16:28), or 'see the kingdom of God after it has come with power' (Mark 9:1), or see the 'kingdom of God' (Luke 9:27)." He accounted for this by saying since Jesus didn’t come as "rapidly as promised," and since Matthew 10:23 was not fulfilled "by the time of the last of the original band of the apostles died," then Jesus' promise remains "unfulfilled," thus Jesus is not the Messiah.

Bro. Anderson, your position aligns with the critics of Christianity who argue Jesus failed to accomplish the six points in Daniel 9:24. AFP does not, for its position biblically proves Jesus perfectly fulfilled Daniel 9:24, thus verifying He is the Christ of the Apostles. I hope your next response contains the scriptures you use when explaining how Jesus did not fulfill these prophecies."

Again it was YOU who introduced this argument NOT him. Do you understand what it means to affirm or rebuttal?