Quote:
Originally Posted by KWSS1976
See the way I see it is people then needed signs and maricles/wonders (sp) to prove that jesus was who he was in that time we have the bible now to tell us all this and the bible is not even in order to how things happened back then..
|
Yet, how can you know that the Bible is true without "signs" (and I'm willing to be rather open ended about "signs)."
The Bible is a testimony of those who were declaring the Gospel in the first century (NT). If "signs" were needed in the first century to validate that testimony, would not "signs" be needed today to validate the exact same testimony from the exact same people?