Quote:
Originally Posted by Adino
Given the fact that the resurrection proved:
1) that the sins imputed to Christ had been forever remitted prior to the resurrection (else he would not have risen) and...
2) that it was the 'pre-resurrection' application of the blood of Christ which brought about the 'pre-resurrection' remission...
Can we all agree the doctrine of baptismal sin remission no longer holds any water?
|
Adino, I appreciate your knowledge and I am just now reading the last few post on this discussion. In regards to sins being remitted on the cross wouldn't that lead into the doctrine of limited atonement. Meaning that God died for the sins of the elect or that his blood purchased his bride. Just wondering what your thoughts are on limited atonement.
Threaded Mode
