Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp
Introducing a "synagogue" theory into the text, which has absolutely NOTHING to do w/ the subject of I Tim. 2:11-15, & is totally unsupported from the actual text itself. Then, you pat him on the back saying "good job"????? I'd say you need to get your money back on your "hermeneutics" courses, or reread the books! |
I'd say you need to save up for one or two yourself!
Don't say it's "unsupported" then go on to say you reject it because it doesn't agree with you.
If NT churches were very much influenced and shaped by Judaism (the faith of most of the church leaders, Christ being the fulfillment of their law), I think it's a fair assertion that these traditions would still be in the church only a year or two later. It's not really a stretch.
You must HATE exegetical commentaries, huh? Nothing but "assertions" of people interpreting passages in light of their historical context. Those silly buffoons!
Threaded Mode
