Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan
I know you were asking. There are people here (including some Admin types) that equate questions with statements.
No, merely being capable of doing something does not give you the right to choose whether or not to do it.
No, it is not subjective to the will of God (subject to the will of God but not subjective). Under the Law of Moses, which is God's covenant specifically with the nation of Israel, ham is still forbidden meat and there are many other things that are still against that law.
|
The ability to do something does give the choice... and it subjective to the will of God... if God so changes his mind, then it is no longer the same... right and wrong is subjective and not objective.... By saying it is not subjective you are implying it is objective meaning that it is superfluous to any outside opinions... FALSE... it is subjective to the will of GOD.
The right is granted by ability.... a choice is not defined by law or restriction more or less it IS defined by ability. By saying someone does not have a choice, you are saying there is an ABSOLUTE decision meaning that someone else has predefined the outcome. God gave man the choice he said not to eat or you will "surely die". If there were to be no choice given, there would have been no tree.
Man in his stupidity (or should I say woman), weighed the consequences and decided so. In this she made three inherent choices... to disobey God, to obey the devil, to eat rather than not.