Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
It has to mean something for the Jewish believers to notice that the Gentiles were filled the SAME WAY they were, and tongues were noted. NOTHING ELSE says one way or another about initial evidence. Initial evidence was an issue.
Sorry, brethren. I stick to the idea, myself. 
I went around in bouts with good brethren here who claim one receives the Spirit into one's life before Spirit Baptism, and we showed that it cannot be proved that Acts 2 had people get both dual experiences of what they call the Spirit entrance and Spirit baptism. We discussed the issue of the various terms applied to the experience in Acts 2. Infilling, outpouring, baptism, etc. And as much as onesteppers claim three steppers cannot conclusively prove their point, neither can onesteppers. |
I would take that further and say that three steppers (although I don't care for that term) have more conclusive, visible evidence than a one-stepper with our eyes closed and hands tied behind our backs. Just sayin'.....
Threaded Mode
