Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
While everyone is basically saying how studpid this post is, I think the point it makes is both valid and sad.
Valid in that our president (who is sworn in on the Bible) probably wouldn't even bat an eye, and the American media, along with the medias of the world would either 1)not care enough to report it or 2)give a "bravo" approval
The sad part is not that there would be outrage and riots threatened by Chrisitans (riots would be sad, since thats anti christian) but the sad part is, as long as it didn't effect their homes, jobs, and finances, 99% of the "christians" in the country would give a care, probably with the attitude "its a free country"
|
Yes, the post was and is as ridiculous as I, and others, have said. First of all, it's foolish jesting about burning a bible. I'm surprised that doesn't bother you.
Second, a scenario has been created, that has
not taken place, and judgment of our president has been issued based on something that hasn't happened! How completely ridiculous.
Why don't we start a thread that says, "I'll bet if George W. Bush had ever had the opportunity, he would have hidden nuclear weapons in the desert of Iraq so that they could be discovered just to save face" and then a bunch of we liberals start ripping him for that.
You wouldn't stand for that, would you Jason? So while you and others still have the chance to sound, at least, remotely intelligent, why don't you just stop judging the president for something that has never happened?
Threaded Mode
