Quote:
Originally Posted by ILG
Yeah, I can see I ticked you off, but I was just giving my opinion. I know to some, that is wrong.  |
LOL! That's what I like about you ILG, you state things in as plain a manner as I like to do.
You are right, it did tick me off. And I will tell you why. God help us! LOL!
This was your original statement:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILG
Jesus Himself said in the book of Matthew to be baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. I wonder if Jesus was messed up about His theology when He said that.
|
That, IMO, was a very astounding thing for me to read you saying.
My scripture references showed that the Apostles, by knowing the scriptures, understood what Jesus was saying in
Matthew 28:19.
In
Luke 24:45-46, it says that he opened their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures. "And he said unto them,
Thus it was written...." They had read the scriptures and being familiar with them, Jesus opened their understanding concerning himself.
Now, you've shared your past, knocked the uselessness of the UPC, but all the while, you didn't know and you questioned something as solid as
Matthew 28:19, saying that Jesus was possibly "messed up" about His theology. You are purporting that Jesus didn't know what He was about?
You talked about wanting to write a book about your experiences in the UPC, but what I see is that IF you found fault in the UPC, you also were a "weak link" yourself, not knowing the scriptures.
Yes, that is plain, but I wanted to say it. Because that ticks me off. I apologize if this ticks YOU off, but I wanted, I needed to say it nonetheless.
Threaded Mode
