Biblical Inerrancy has nothing, absolutely NOTHING to do with interpretation. Oneness interpret scriptures all the time, for example, scriptures that speak of the Son creating. Rather than interpret that to mean the Son existed as the Son and created everything we interpret to mean something else. That does not mean we think the text is in error.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy
Biblical inerrancy is the doctrinal position that the Bible is considered accurate and totally free of error. Within Christianity, some mainstream Evangelical and Protestant groups adhere to the current inerrancy of Scripture as it reads today. The Roman Catholic view is summarized by the editors of the New American Bible:
-----------------
I never said
Genesis 1 was inaccurate or full of errors. I said it
needs to be interpreted and I gave an example why
You are interpreting a day to be 24 hours
Yet language says I can use the word Day and not mean 24. It could refer to a TIME of Day...day time
It can be used non-specific like "Hurry up, I don't have all day".
Yet the Day time or Day light is the result of the Sun, but the Son was not created until later on.
God created Light, but the bible does not elaborate on what that was, still God called Light "day". But according to the Hebrew the word Yom does not have to mean a literal 24 hour period. It can be an unspecified amount of time,
So on the first "period of creation" God created Light and does not say what that refers to.
You choose to ignore that part but the fact that it's not specified leaves it up to interpretation.
You choose to believe each Day was a literal
24 hour period, that God was on a
human time clock that did not even exist yet since time is based on the rotation of the earth as it rotates around the sun.
Threaded Mode
