Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
Ok Prax, please clarify how you believe in Biblical inerrancy, while not accepting the creation account in Genesis 1.
|
sigh...Im gonna say this one last time. It's not a matter of ACCEPTING. Its not about authority or inerrency. It's about IN TER PRE TATION.
You keep taking my acceptance but different interpretation and turning that into me not accepting it.
Last time.
The issue is one of IN TER PRE TATION. I don't take Genesis as a literal account of creation. I do take to to be about creation.
And I already gave an example of the whole "evening/morning" issue. It's not meant to be taken literal. By literal I mean, "There is no room for interpretation":
Just because something is not a literal account of creation does not mean it isn't an account of creation