Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Badejo
Yes. However the dating methods are not always accurate, but certainly archeology goes a long way in vindicating the Bible against many skeptics claims.
Again, I'm not against, science, I'm not against archeology. What I am against are theories which are against the Word of God. Evolution isn't demonstratable science, its not science at all, it is simply a theory, which quite frankly will not be proved even in our lifetimes with all the technology we have, or forever, because it is not possible. It is a theory accepted by faith.
|
Not always accurate? How do you know? You previously suggested you didn't really know a lot about the topic.. Its amazing you can say that but be clueless on the topic...in fact you defer to videos and quotes from champion YEC that you don't really even understand.
I suggest the argument that you made earlier about dating and it only being so because the evolutionists assumed that the earth is billions of years old is just a desperate red herring.
It's good enough for biblical archeologists as long as they don't go past their preconceived "the earth is only 8000 years old or so" idea.
Don't you see? Forget evolution. Dating is science a science used in archeology, anthropology and forensic medicine, and even if it's not 100% accurate it's not so inaccurate that archeologists and forensics don't use it. So let's say they are off by 50 years...what does that do to the dig where dinosaur bone are found and dated to a couple hundred thousand or million years? Off by how much? Statistically you still have an earth that is scientifically much older than your 8-10 thousand year old earth
Threaded Mode
