Quote:
Originally Posted by ILG
It was really the district superintendent and the presbyter. The board never even had a chance to see anything. The district superintendent kept the board from seeing the compilation that my husband took off of work and drove three hours to show them. He told my husband outside the door that "we aren't going to look at that today".
At a later meeting the district superintendent and presbyter took a cursory glance at it before ripping into my husband about some decisions he made. Decisions which were based on decisions the district superintendent had made and didn't follow through on.
At any rate, I would really like to hear from Steve Epley, who would know more about how things were done in the older days, how these things were done. It doesn't excuse what the district superintendent and presbyster did but it helps me understand more why they would not just jump into the situation like we thought they would. Even so, we expected they may not jump in but we at least expected some sort of explanation or discussion on what they might do. At the time, it looked to me like a cover up but that hopefully was not their intent. Of course, I will probably never know.
|
Were y'all not able to appeal beyond the district?