Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais
EB, I for one would love to beat you over the head with something, anything. 
But, I agree with Steve Epley here. The conclusiveness simply isn't there, IMHO. I have to just learn to find some way to get along with you on these points even if I don't agree with you. |
Futurists and Preterists in the past have debated
Matthew 24,
Luke 21, and
Mark 13. These are the candy stick chapters for all those who teach any form of eschatology. With all this chest pumping, and pulpit thumping and saber rattling you would of thought Jason would of obliged me. Yet, I have repeatedly asked Jason over and over again to affirm that
Matthew 24,
Luke 21, and
Mark 13 are leading to future events, or show where these chapters have their thousand year gaps. For anyone to believe in a certain eschatology they would have to at least have these three chapters reconciled. That is all I'm asking. For anyone to say these three chapters are too broad are just coping out, and making excuses for their lack of understanding of these three chapters.
What I find interesting is, that I don't want to beat you over the head.
In Jesus name
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com
Threaded Mode
