This is the rife nonsense argued against
Ezekiel 16 to excuse away something God did in His eyes for His lady as though He did something He PERMITTED, but later showed displeasure over. As if.
Re.
Ezekiel 16, rdp said...
In order for God to show permission for something and later show displeasure, as rdp said here, and yet see GOD HIMSELF said HE CLOTHED Israel in jewelry, is to make God double minded. Permitting someone to do something YOU DO NOT FAVOUR does not mean YOU DO IT YOURSELF.
GOD DIVORCED ISRAEL. Hating it means God hated the idea it had to occur. But people have to reconcile the FACT that God divorced Israel Himself with the FACT He hates divorce. The only way to reconcile that is to use common sense and realize the ACT of divorcing is not wrong,
OR GOD DID SOMETHING WRONG. It means
the situation requiring it is what He hates.
RDP, see if you can answer this directly without hedging.
DID GOD DO WRONG WHEN HE DECKED ISAEL WITH JEWELRY? DID GOD DO WRONG WHEN HE DIVORCED ISRAEL?
Did God ALLOW HIMSELF,
when in actuality He knew it was wrong, to divorce and to deck Israel with jewelry? Yes or no?
Why would God do something Himself that He tolerated for men to do but later showed His displeasure in? I really want to see that answer from you.
So, God in weakness had a problem with pride and later straightened Himself and everyone else out? That seems to be what you are saying.
Let's see some answers, RDP. Try to use a little scholarliness at least instead of the juvenile multitude of question marks and letters in a words.
Threaded Mode
