10.01.09-The End of Haneywood - D. Bernard New GS

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith

Thee seems to be some confusion around definitions and history. Here are some facts about CLC.

We were taught that one could be justified at faith (declared to be right with God, that is quite substantial, but that is not full salvation, the normative New Birth experience is to repent, faith, baptism in water and Spirit) That is not one step.

They (staff) were honest enough to show that our founders and how some even to the present days had divergent views on full NT salvation and how one becomes a member of the Bride of Christ the Church.

Also it is in the charter/by laws of Christian LIfe College/WABC that Acts 2:38 will not be taught as a Heaven or Hell issue.

Those are the facts, as presently I can't vouch that those things still exist. But up to a few years ago they were still present.

Keith,

You were a little ahead of me, but other than LY I don't remember any of the faculty ever saying what they personally believed. DS for example would default to what Clyde Haney taught or what some other old timer had to say about the issue. So for people to say there was a one-step teaching at CLC isn't accurate. They did seem to me to be more fair to that position in terms of talking about those who held that position.