Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
I asked you to prove your arguement not simply pulling a Strongs' definition out and going "seeee" It is your assertion to prove.
|
I already stated some facts were not stated in scripture. And I proved that to you by asking you why wool and linen should not be worn together. You failed to answer me, dodging it, and then trying to put focus on how you asked me to show you scripture for the false worship connection to
Deut 22:5. Now, if your argument is iron-clad, answer my question.
Quote:
|
LOL Simply throwing definitions doesn't prove application and actual usage of the word and usage shows it is nowhere even 20% used as "warrior." I asked for specifics. You demand the word is warrior. I beg to differ by the scripture itself along with it's usage all throughout the OT.
|
Not good enough. Prove your point. GHEBER was used for a reason instead of simply MAN - ish.
Quote:
Translate Deut 22:5 for me how it should read in english since "man" is incorrect. Why was not MAN used itself?
Sure it doesn't tell us all background but the texts usage shows us it is not strictly about that. Moses pointed out many times but he nowhere he even hints at this like that escpecially when pagan aspects of other nations when needed. I do believe arguing against idolatry and idol worship would cover crazy acts of crossdressing to a fertility goddess. so to me the point of saying one thing and limiting it to another is rather strange at best.
NOTE: Even when used in contrast with OTHER words for "man" enos, adawm, yish etc.... it is not shown with distinction as "warrior."
|
It is not simply a male. Period. Now, if you demand me to provide scripture for the worship issue, then prove I should be able to provide it by showing me scripture as to why linen should not be mixed with wool.