Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
I already stated some facts were not stated in scripture. And I proved that to you by asking you why wool and linen should nto be worn together. You failed to answer me, dodging it, and then trying to put focus on how you asked me to show you scripture for the false worship conduction to Deut 22:5. Now, if your argument is iron-clad, answer my question.
|
hilarious... as if your POINT proves the translation and meaning of
Deut 22:5. seriously. I already said sometimes it doesn't but the text doesn't even hint thus IT IS SPECULATION by YOU! Thanks for proving my point!
Quote:
|
Not good enough. Prove your point. GHEBER was used for a reason instead of simply MAN.
|
So you re going to throw the burden on me. LOL So "warrior" is it's only meaning Mike? I asked
you to show usage of it to prove it.
Really so it is never used simply as male?Again I ask YOU to translate the text as your argument demands!!!!!!!!
Period.
Quote:
|
Now, if you demand me to provide scripture for the worship issue, then prove I should be able to provide it by showing me scripture as to why linen should not be mixed with wool.
|
run around instead of dealing with the text Mike and the actual usage. You are arguing about PLAUSIBILITY of a speculating opinion because you can throw out SEE the bible doesn't always tell us ALL of what it is referencing. Guess what... yes it it truuueee but it DOESN'T MAKE YOUR ARGUMENT for actual usage according to HOW THE WORDS ARE USED IN THE ACTUAL TEXT! You demand and apply a complete bias to a word without studying the word as a whole AND it's actual usage in the text. Again answer the Q's.