Charismatic Sweep

[Michael The Disciple]

1. We've been round and round about your and the evangelicals false and historically incorrect understanding of the Pentecostal Finished Work view of entire sanctification. Once again your mischaracterization and utter lack of interest in at least using historically accurate terms and definitions means you simply have an agenda that is NOT focused on truth and accuracy.

I am referring to the Evangelical "finished work" doctrine. I have encountered and opposed it many times against its Preachers. I teach sinless perfection from Jesus and the Apostles.

2. Your failure to answer questions about your doctrine is NOT about you giving explanations I don't agree with. It's about you cutting and running and refusing to even respond to questions, like "if all things were made by the logos, but the logos was also made, then the logos made the logos, right?" etc.

I have directed you to what I teach on the subject. I have multiple threads on the forum on the topic. I cannot make it any clearer than using scripture. If you want me to just use my own words and attempt to explain it in a few sentences apart from scripture let me know.

3. I ALWAYS answer questions put to me about what I teach, EXCEPT when the questioner has already refused to answer questions put to them.

If so why does not everyone who you say you answer questions for agree with you? Is it not because you may not be answering the questions accurately?

4. Sinless perfection means no sin. Sin is the transgression of the law, including the Fourth Commandment. So no, you and I do NOT agree on the doctrine of Christian perfection. You, like many others, redefine sin to exclude things you practice and allow, like Sabbath breaking.

There are plenty of refutations to the fact Christians are not under the law of Moses on the Forum. Several threads are up as we speak in the Deep Waters section. Some of the posts are by me. If you answer all questions why have you not converted lets say Mike Blume to law keeping? Could it be he like myself and others dont find your answers to be "answers" ON THIS TOPIC?

No doubt you DO have real answers on some topics which I respect and appreciate.

Should we start another thread about whether the New Covenant Christian is under the law? Or should I go to you and Mike Blumes thread already in process?