I want to address this, because the accusation of these men being control hungry keeps coming up.
From my understanding of reading on this, the formation of this org is set up as such that there are "term limits" on the leadership. Of the Executive Committee, every year, one of the originals will be removed by lot every year, and cannot hold a position for at least one year. This assures that there will be no "Original 6" keeping control in the org.
So tell me, If this is all about control and position, why would the Original 6 create bylaws that will in effect take them out of the leadership position after so long?
I would have to wonder how they expect to keep their org from going the way they believe the UPC did if they won't be in control for more than a year?
It just doesn't make sense.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!