Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
That was not the bigger picture of what LS said.
LS did not say "obedient and submissive"..he directly, not indirectly but directly related the angelic protection FOR THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY to women with uncut hair
I have always known, in the Spirit, that in our churches and in our homes where our women did not cut their hair that there was some kind of angelic power and protection that was there continuously, but I didn't know until this year, until I went to the Greek and dug it out.
I didn't know how really accurate I was. I've always felt it in the Spirit, but now I can prove it biblically, biblically, that in churches where our women do not cut their hair. It's not the long and short of it, ladies. It is "uncut". Don't tell me you have long hair and then keep trimming the ends so that it doesn't get any longer than where it is now. That's not the issue. The issue is not long or short. The issue is "uncut" because in some cultures women's hair, it does not grow long. So, it's not long or short. That's not the issue. The issue is "uncut".
I have known and now can prove it, spiritually from the Bible, that in our churches, in our homes, where our women, our ladies do not cut their hair there is a kind of angelic protection that flows out from them for the whole Christian community.
It flows OUT FROM THEM! Good grief.
|
Any place you hear or read or see LS say "uncut hair", just replace it with "obedience and submission", or "obedient and submissive", and see if you would then agree with his point? The fact is, that "uncut hair" is an issue of "obedience and submission", and this is the whole point LS is driving at. You cannot claim to be totally "obedient and submitted" without subscribing to the instructions of
1 Cor 11. Obedience and submission IS the issue LS is dealing with, and other parts of his message enumerate it as such directly conntected with uncut hair. Disregarding this part of the connection obscures the points he is trying to make!
Threaded Mode
