Quote:
Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*
So if he is only speaking of obedience, why did he make this statement:
"I've watched this year. I know some men that are powerful in the Spirit. Powerfully used by God. But, I've watched a couple of them, even this year, they came up against a problem and they could not find an answer to. They couldn't come to any kind of an answer, but the wife, who is in the background, usually, they had never cut their hair. One day he walked in just twisting his hands, one of them in particular, and she came to him and she said, "This is the answer here." And she mapped out an answer that was so perfect, he staggered at the wisdom in it. Do you know why she got a hold of that and he didn't? Because ladies, among us, who do not cut their hair are entangled with angels and the wisdom and power of angels that men are not connected to and they cannot be connected to it."
He has stated numerous times that women have a power that MEN DON'T HAVE, because of their long hair.
That is not problematic for you????
|
Yes, he continually asserts it's problematic language and unfortunate but not false doctrine.
The end is teaching on submission and obedience (which consequently is the aim of any teaching) ... justifies the means (faulty hermeneutic, problematic language, whacky demonstrations, frustrated believers).
I refuse to be castrated.
Threaded Mode
