Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Obfuscation is the word because you are arguing ad nausuem that nobody teaches "magic hair".
and every time you have done that 3-4 of us have reminded you...reminded you, we are not saying LS or RR says "magic hair".
Over and over like repeating yourself "wins" the argument you fall back to the same thing "they never say magic hair"...ok why do you do that? We got it. You disagree with the term "Holy Magic Hair"..that is a non-sequitor to our argument.
|
Labelling your argument against LS teaching as "Holy Magic Hair" is a blatant misrepresenation, and implies that you are suggesting LS teaches "supernatural powers in the hair". You have said it yourself, whether you used the word "magical powers in the hair" verbatim or not. Now you are trying to get by with what you are accusing LS of. You are saying "I didn't say he said he believes in 'magic powers in the hair'", while the whole time saying "LS is teaching supernatural powers in the hair". Call it what you want, supernatural, magical, etc... you are accusing LS of teaching something he is not teaching. Your advocacy of DA's website further discredits your objection to LS's message.
If you want to clarify and define our language here, I'd be glad to do so, so as to avoid your obbseive preoccupation with "obfuscating" and "non-sequitors". I would rather reason through this, than debate, acknowledging each other's strong points and weaknesses, and being intellectually honest about our relative positions, finding common ground where we can, and identifying our differences and why. Or we can resort to debate tactics that are inneffective in advancing communication and mutual understanding. The ball is in your court, in that I am trying!
Threaded Mode
