Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDylan
I am going to attempt to crystalize the three areas of concern. You may be able to add more, others may as well:
1.) What LS teaches: - A woman ought not cut her hair
- A woman who does not cut her hair has power (authority, liberty, freedom) because of (by, through, or with) the angels (I think this is near an exact quote of LS).
- A woman has access to authority in the spirit realm because of her obedeince in not cutting her hair that a man does not and cannot have
2.) Methods LS uses that are deemed objectionable - Allusions and references to witchcraft and occultic understanding of the hair
- Multiplicitous andectodes referencing woman who have laid their hair out on people or prayer requests, resulting in affirmative responses from God on behalf of these prayers
3.)Actions of those that heard LS teaching this message - Women laying hair out over prayer requests
- women laying hair out over people
- Women in conferences letting their hair down and shaking it
- Women appealing to God referencing their uncut hair in order to convince or pursuade God to answer their requests affirmatively
- The phenomenon of women letting their hair down spreading to other areas of the fellowship
Do I have this correct, or am I missing something?
|
I more or less agree with that assessment. So now we are going to hear that none of these things are wrong?
EDIT: for the record 1a has nothing to do with HMH. That is a totally separate issue.