Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Jfrog I just want to add first of all unless this man talked to LS he has no way of knowing what LS is doing.
|
You are correct, I have no idea what LS is doing, or his specific motivation behind the way he presents his message the way he does. What I have done in my theory, the one that jfrog responded to conderately
here, is my attempt to give LS the benefit of the doubt and figure out his reasoning in a way that would put him and his intention in the most noble light. I WANT to give LS the benefit of the doubt here, which is unlike what others want to do. I do not believe LS is trying to overtly encourage any practice outside of biblical instruction. I am trying to prove him innocent, you guys are trying to prove him guilty, thus the fundamental difference in perception and perspective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
HOWEVER if he realized his hoodoo voodoo presentation of the occult is wrong he NEEDS to do more than making an adjustment to how he presents it but come out and tell his followers "I was wrong to say that, please forgive me. I don't want any of you to be under the impression that we should do this because they do it" etc etc
|
One time Prax, one time that I have observed, in the Memphis clip from two years ago, has he made reference to "occult"... I do not believe his intention is "hoodoo voodoo"... As I stated many times, I believe his reference of that was to draw the contrast between what the witches feel they have (i.e. power in their hair), and what we have (i.e. the "Word of God", and "more power than anything else in the world"... his own words). You are not giving LS the benefit of the doubt, and are bent on proving him guilty. I, on the other hand, am doing what I can, with as much reasoning and benefit of the doubt that I can offer, to prove him innocent.
Threaded Mode
