Quote:
Originally Posted by Edward Anglin
PO, Bob seems to be a good guy. Rather intelligent. Loves a good argument.
Trouble is, he's full of it (and no I won't define what "it" is).
He came on AFF with both barrels blasting, running his mouth and burning up his keyboard. He entered the convo as if he knew something everybody else didn't. Time has proven he didn't know squat.
It is still a magic hair message. Witchcraft is still a major component of each message preached about this topic. Women are shaking their hair, and laying their hair on objects and people just as they have been told to.
It's not a minor misunderstanding. It's major false doctrine.
It places faith in objects instead of God. It worships creation instead of the Creator.
|
This is the kind of erratic alarmism I was "blasting both barrells" at, and will continue to do so. Witchcraft is NOT a component of "each message" preached about this topic. In fact, when I heard it in person, witchcraft was not even mentioned.
If women are shaking hair, laying hair, or whatever as a means of focusing faith to believe for miracles, I have no problem with that. These effusive acts aren't alarming to me any more than people laying in Peter's shadows for healing, or sending Paul's handkercheifs and apron is alarming to me... I guess Peter's and Paul's followers were putting their faith in the object of Peter's shadow, or Paul's handkerchiefs, rather than in "God"??? I guess these people were worshipping "Peter" rather than the creator? HILARIOUS!!!
...
Ed, if I'm full of "it", you just wallowed in "it"... and "no I am not going to define what 'it' is"... You're the one, both barrells blasting, entering into a conversation nearing page 40 now, thinking you know something you don't know. I suggest you take a good dose of your own medicine before your incontrovertably anemic acumen becomes unpalatable and boring...
And FTR, I sure do love a good argument! I just wish you were a more formidable "opponend" (as in the argument, not in person).
Threaded Mode
