|
Re: How many times did you ask God for the Holy Gh
Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman
I'm speaking from a 3-stepper perspective as I understand it. There cannot and would never be a disclaimer concerning tongues and salvation with the 3-stepper. For example, if a person repented, was baptized and they said "I'm redeemed for I have been born of the Spirit", the reaction to that by a 3-stepper would include the question of 'evidence' of tongues in some way. If the person indicated they had not spoken in tongues, the 3-stepper would be quick to point out that the person isn't born again....not redeemed. Tongues are an integral indivisible part of the 3-stepper program.
|
Right, because there is no other way to look at it when tongues are considered the only initial evidence of Spirit baptism. But that still does not equate tongues with salvation.
Quote:
|
And I ask again, who taught such a doctrine IMMEDIATELY before the 1913 introduction of such theology? Where was the church in the 1800's teaching such things?
|
All I know is that Acts 10 shows it to be the case. Who cares about who or who did not teach it?
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.
"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
|
Threaded Mode
