Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by coadie

You are a non science junk artist.





The guy has nothing on clotting. He has no blood. He has no DNA. He is just arm chair speculating and pelthais gobbles it up.

"The guy" is Michael Behe who YOU quoted on the subject of clotting.

Get a grip, dude. I just tracked down your "quote mining" attempt and linked to the entire interview.

Behe - YOUR source that YOU quoted - is a well known EVOLUTIONIST. He is often cited by folks in the Intelligent Design movement because Behe is also a believer. But Behe VERY MUCH accepts and teaches the principle of COMMON DESCENT, one of the cornerstones of Darwin's theory of Natural Selection.

Originally Posted by coadie

This is for the sorcerors handbook. They can't find the onset of blood clotting and we know it.
They don't have material or observation. Just hope and wishfull thinking.

If Behe is such a bad source, why did you quote him on blood clotting? (http://apostolicfriendsforum.com/sho...919#post972919). You actually ct-and-pasted a statement by Behe that was easily Googled and tracked down to the interview that I linked to.

Or were you hoping to convince everyone that Behe's words were actually your own? That's plagiarism.

Originally Posted by coadie

Pelthais is so uneducatted that he can't apply logic. If the clotting mechanism was missing, a placental mammal would die in childbirth. It is a fatal shortcomming. Too much or not enough thrombin and we have pulmonary emboli.

But they have some bone pieces and stories after stories.

Evolutionists don't follow scientific methods. They just conjure up dreams.

So the link fails and we still waste time believeing the crackpot religion of darwinism???

You quoted Behe as authoritative and now you claim that this "link fails" after learning about Behe's real scientific outlook.

Lame-o.

(That's a "home made word").