Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

What do you want me to do with it? You have one out of context accusation...which is all you and your buddy Coadie have, accusations. When you lack logic, facts, truth, you resort to accusations

First of all this debate is NOT about biblical authority and accuracy. It's about the scientific data which you are ignorant of.

I disagree. This isn't about science, this is about faith in what God's Word does say. Can science PROVE evolution? If not (and it cannot) then its about faith, not science.

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Second, as far as the bible is concerned it's really more of a debate between hyperliteralists who are inconsistent themselves because where as they demand we take Genesis 1:1 literal, literally 6 days, they don't always take everything else literally.

Bologna. Prax you well know that there are literal and figurative scriptures. Do you think God literally has wings? Do you think I take EVERY scripture literally. I've seen your reaction when trinitarians misrepresent your views, so please don't misrepresent mine. I will try to return the favor.

The only leg that theistic evolutionists have to stand on concerning Genesis 1 is that it is figurative/poetic, which is a very weak point. Genesis 1 is not presented as figurative or poetry, it is not referred to in other scripture as anything but a literal account, and the methods which define Hebrew poetry are lacking from the creation account.

This isn't about hyperliteralism, its about what does the Bible say, and really I don't think its that difficult to discern the creation account.

Originally Posted by Praxeas

I never denied the authority of the bible. I never said the bible was full of errors. That is a lie you both have lied about because you can't handle either the biblical points I made nor Pel's scientific data.

1)I never said you DID directly deny the authority of the Bible, same for Pelathias. I have GREAT respect for both of you. I do believe that the logical end of believing in theistic evolution IS to deny the Bible, not explicitly and blatantly, but implicitly and subtly. IOW I know neither of you would CLAIM to deny the Bible, but atheists would absolutely love your position becuase it is against Biblical inerrancy and authority.

2)I'm not seeing many Biblical points, what Biblical points aren't we handaling, especially relating to the topic?