Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
I think your good friend, J effrey, believes Peter and Paul taught different ways of salvation because of Luke's emphasis. Did Paul preach any thing different than what Peter preached in Acts 2? See Galatians 1 and 2.
What I'm trying to say is that Peter and Paul preached the same message. They did not disagree on the message. Paul may have not been quoted by Luke as preaching Acts 2:38 VERBATIM but we can see that Paul taught the same things.....believers were baptized in water immediately and filled with the Spirit with the evidence of speaking with other tongues. The message had to be the same since their is only one gospel and one faith that was once delivered to the saints. |
REALLY??? That's what I believe?
Actually, I think you'll have a hard time connecting tongues to being saved. You make the mistake of thinking Acts is the most broad interpretation of "how to" be saved (which it isn't a how-to book at all), and fitting all of Paul's incomplete writings into the broadest book. Let Luke speak for himself. Let Paul speak for himself. They aren't disagreeing or contradicting! They are giving unique thoughts and ideas on a myriad of subjects.
Listen, I'm only stating what any Hermeneutics professor would say. Pennies like Hermeneutics, but not when it takes the Sacred Cow (called Acts) down to an equal footing with all of scripture.
Threaded Mode
