Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
Incorrect. The 120 spoke in tongues in acts 2. And each case where tongues are recored show the main pattern for what peoples, and need not be mentioned in detail each time it happened later. Even non-pentecostals and non-apostolics see that.
I disagree. The pattern was established. |
Why do you find the tongues pattern more compelling than the "apostles presence" pattern?
I say the pattern is that in every case someone is mentioned as receiving the Holy Ghost in Acts an apostle was present.
You say the pattern is that in every case someone is menitioned as receiving the Holy Ghost in Acts that tongues were present.
How can you believe in only half of the actual recorded pattern?
Threaded Mode
