Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
Why do you find the tongues pattern more compelling than the "apostles presence" pattern?
I say the pattern is that in every case someone is mentioned as receiving the Holy Ghost in Acts an apostle was present.
You say the pattern is that in every case someone is menitioned as receiving the Holy Ghost in Acts that tongues were present.
How can you believe in only half of the actual recorded pattern?
|
You miss the point. All sorts of groups of people are covered int eh basic pattern. Jews in
Acts 2. Gentiles in
Acts 10 disciples of former leaders of God in
Acts 19, namely those following John the Baptist. Why do you resist that pattern? It's a two-way street.
Threaded Mode
