BUMP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Brother, I cannot be more specific than this:
MATT 24:27-31
Is he coming back again or not? It's not complicated.
|
EB, why is it that you will not deal with this one issue? It is a hundred times more important than those 3 chapters. You want to debate so bad on those 3 chapters because there are a FEW verses you can make a strong case for being in the past, probably even a stronger case than I. You probably have loads of pre-written material ready to unload. Yet even if you make a stronger case for the Jews being persecuted in synagouges being past (which certainly did happen in the past), how does that relate to the entire chapter being fulfilled? The climax and main point is the second coming of Christ in Matt 24:27-31. That is the main issue, I want to debate it, and you are dodging like your running for politcial office. Then send prax a pm that I agreed to debate the entire 3 chapters, which agreement I never made. Please quote the post where I said I would debate that specifically.
Now you say that eschatology is fulfilled, I say the biggest event in eschatology is yet to come (the Second Coming of Christ). Do you want to defend your central doctrine-or do you know that when that is proved to be a blantant error, the entire foundation of Full preterism crumbles like a house of cards.
so I conclude with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Brother, I cannot be more specific than this:
MATT 24:27-31
Is he coming back again or not? It's not complicated.
|
Threaded Mode
