Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 03-14-2011, 04:02 PM
onefaith2 onefaith2 is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 4,343
Re: The Thief on the Cross

Quote:
Originally Posted by pelathais View Post
No. You err saying "always." While it is true that many in the developing Roman Catholic Church held this view, many did not. Besides, what matters is what the Scripture says and not the contortions people have gone through over the centuries in their misapprehension of Holy Writ.

If "water" in John 3:3-5 is NOT the first birth, then where is the "First Birth" in this whole text of comparisons? The First Birth is constantly compared with the Second Birth ("Born Again").

John 3:6 - That which is born of the flesh is flesh (First Birth). That which is born of the Spirit is spirit (Second Birth).

John 3:12 - "Earthly things" (First Birth) and "heavenly things" (Second Birth).

Why do you chose to introduce a third category into the discussion? ("Almost born-again but now you have to talk in tongues!"). You have been born from your mother's womb, haven't you? If so, then you should understand the "earthly things." But if you fail to understand the "earthly things," then I suppose Jesus' lament that he offers to Nicodemus may be in order. "How shall I tell you of heavenly things?"
The first birth is what Nicodemus thought Jesus was talking about. Jesus was talking about a spiritual birth of water and spirit. Jesus said that which is flesh is flesh and that which is Spirit is spirit because he was contrasting the two births in Nicodemus' mnd. JEsus said you Nicodemus must be born of water and of Spirit.

Jesus would never tell someone that they would have to be born first naturally and then Spiritually to enter in the kingdom. How does that make any sense? Everyone is already born of water in that case.

Secondly I could quote many references historically.. study it.. the church was not aware of the doctrine you propose until much later. Baptism was always a necessity.


There is not such thing as half born. Where do you get that? If you repent and be baptized you will be saved. Its a promise that the Lord will never go back on. There is no such thing as half born people.
__________________
To be able to unite in difference carries more weight than all the opinions the universe can hold

Last edited by onefaith2; 03-14-2011 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The thief on the cross and baptism... jfrog Fellowship Hall 11 02-19-2010 11:18 AM
The Greatest Time Thief, Ever EA Fellowship Hall 33 01-10-2010 08:29 PM
Thief on the Cross: A New Covenant Believer? SDG The D.A.'s Office 104 07-04-2008 09:59 AM
Why wasn't it necessary for the thief on the cross to be baptized? Kutless Deep Waters 24 04-17-2007 08:52 AM
Identity Thief on the loose? BoredOutOfMyMind Fellowship Hall 3 03-15-2007 09:45 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Salome

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.