Quote:
Originally Posted by BobDylan
Irrelevant. The verbiage of 1 Cor 11:10, however one may interpret the verse, is directly in the purview of a message or sermon centered around the principles and instruction in immediate context of that verse. A message about adultery or gossip would naturally be couched in scriptural language introduced in the context where these issues are addressed. Similarly, a message about authority, submission, and obedience from the text of 1 Cor 11 is going to be framed in the concepts and verbiage introduced in that passage... |
Irrelevant? You keep arguing this is all about obedience and submission, then you bring up that he preaches they should be obedient to the other things too but you failed to answer the question which proves my point.
The point is, what the issue is here is NOT obedience or submission. The point is what we have said it is from the beginning, the point you keep obfuscating. That LS is teaching a direct connection to uncut hair this whole business of protection, NOT obedience...uncut hair. If it was obedience you would have answered my question with a YES.
LS does not say "it's your obedience". He does not say "There is authority in your obedience"
He says it's your uncut hair. That was why he quote witchcraft. That was why he supposedly "went to the greek". He says it FLOWS FROM HER to the christian community.
What a load of rubbish. That is false doctrine, completely unbiblical
Further in the past you have tried to say we have authority in the spirit world, whatever that means, because of our obedience.
So here again then your answer SHOULD have been YES. You are acting as LS's Apologist so you are the one making this an issue of obedience.
Again if that is the case then it is NOT irrelevant.
You are attempting to spin doctor what LS has taught and Im not sure why. Do you get paid? Is he a close friend and asked you to clean up his mess?
Threaded Mode
